Sunday, July 28, 2013

Willie Brown: Dig a hole and fill it with money

Willie Brown can laugh now

Now that he never has to run for office again, Willie Brown can afford to be candid. From his column in this morning's Chronicle:

News that the Transbay Terminal is something like $300 million over budget should not come as a shock to anyone. We always knew the initial estimate was way under the real cost. Just like we never had a real cost for the Central Subway or the Bay Bridge or any other massive construction project. So get off it. In the world of civic projects, the first budget is really just a down payment. If people knew the real cost from the start, nothing would ever be approved. The idea is to get going. Start digging a hole and make it so big, there's no alternative to coming up with the money to fill it in.

Brown has said this sort of thing before.

The authors of "Megaprojects and Risk" (Brent Flyvberg, Nils Bruzelius) studied hundreds of big projects around the world. They verify Brown's opinion about big projects:

Cost underestimation and overrun cannot be explained by error and seem to be best explained by strategic misrepresentation, namely lying, with a view to getting projects started (page 16).

This "lying"---or, at the very least, a complete indifference to the cost to taxpayers for big projects---is practiced by both politicians and contractors. Labor unions don't have any problem with this, because even dumb, wasteful projects create jobs for their members. The unions then support Democratic Party politicians when they run for office.

As Brown noted, the Central Subway is a good example of the too-big-to-stop practice. This BART project is another example. The California high-speed rail project is the biggest example, but there's at least a chance that the court will put a stop to it and save taxpayers billions of dollars.

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At 9:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rob - thanks for pointing this out.

You forgot the new Bay Bridge, which has cost so much that it would have been much more cost effective to just tear down the old span and have drivers use the San Mateo or San Rafael bridge.

 
At 9:36 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

I disagree. The Bay Bridge had to be rebuilt after the earthquake, but the Central Subway is a completely unnecessary waste of money. The Transbay Terminal is over-designed in the expectation that high-speed rail will actually be built. High-speed rail, like the Central Subway, is another boondoggle and a bottomless pit for the state's taxpayers.

 
At 3:21 PM, Anonymous sfthen said...

Robert Moses: ''Once you sink that first stake, they'll never make you pull it up.''

While the SPUR/ Livable City/ Transpo crowd always cites Jane Jacobs as their guru it's really her nemesis Robert Moses that they emulate.
Moses ran freeways through cities, built bland urban renewal housing which is essentially today's equivalent, HSR/BRT and Smart Growth. Different words, same thing.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home